William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar Essay Essay Example

William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar Essay Essay Julius Caesar shows that people respond to power and glorification in different ways. Discuss. William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar has a strong focal point on the response that assorted characters display to power and glorification. and how and why this response may change between them. Shakspere shows contrast in response to high quality to a great extent throughout the text. and explains that people’s revenge to it will ever differ. Where focal point for some. prevarications in the attainment and retention of power. others prefer a position of conserving Rome’s traditional authorities system. Contrast is seen strongly in character’s positions of Caesar’s decease. and besides in their sentiments of the predating events and Caesar’s addition of power. Despite these differing factors. all characters are portrayed to hold some sort of lecherousness for power. and purpose to derive authorization over citizens. These qualities are seen most strongly across the supporters of the narrative: Caesar. Brutus. Cassius and Antony. Throughout the text. characters claim to oppose Caesar’s regulation for the pure ground of conserving the traditions of Rome’s authorities and heritage. but some developments strongly suggest the subterranean motivation of desire for power. We will write a custom essay sample on William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar Essay specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar Essay specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar Essay specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer The thought of â€Å" [ Rome’s ] broad walk [ embracing ] but merely one man† is dashing to Cassius. and he peculiarly portrays this throughout the drama. joined by Brutus. claiming that the blackwash of Caesar brings them â€Å"peace. freedom and liberty† . However. opposing this. Cassius provinces that he â€Å"was born every bit free as Caesar† and therefore is every bit meriting of power. connoting enviousness or resent toward the omnipotence Caesar achieves. Brutus stands by his purpose. decidedly meaning his portion with the plotters was â€Å"not that [ he ] loved Caesar less. but that [ he ] loved Rome more† . Brutus feels as though Caesar’s leading would negatively impact Rome and the good that Roman citizens have achieved. In contrast. Caesar and Antony both claim that Caesar’s regulation would be positive for Rome. Antony. as a strong protagonist. bases by Caesar and claims that Caesar does hold love for Rome. and would ne’er hold put the destiny of Rome in danger. Although he states this verbally much later in the drama. this is seen through Antony showing the Crown to Caesar upon his return to Rome from get the better ofing Pompey. Caesar himself believes that he is worthy to govern Rome. and wants to derive the trust and support of the Roman citizens. He begins to make this by rejecting the Crown when offered it. cognizing that many people would be unhappy with the credence of the Crown. and the subsequent stoping of the Republic. nevertheless it is apparent that his purposes may alter. When told to go to the Senate as the Crown is traveling to be offered to him once more. Caesar thirstily takes this chance. connoting his desire. Although he is â€Å"for the good of Rome† . he still has purpose to travel against the system of authorities in topographic point for omnipotence. Upon Caesar’s blackwash. the sentiments of many characters is shown to vary strongly. and this becomes progressively apparent as the text continues. Antony immediately ridicules the logical thinking of the blackwa sh. stating that he was non â€Å"ambitious† in the sense of deriving domination. as he was â€Å"thrice presented†¦a kingly crown† and â€Å"he did thrice refuse† . presenting his said â€Å"ambition† to be questionable. This is a mark of his repose toward power and those who have acquired it. contrasting with Cassius. who feels it is boisterous for Caesar to â€Å"bestride the narrow world† as the exclusive leader of Rome. and sees that this is just ground for Caesar’s blackwash. Cassius here appears to hold desire for power. and to utilize Toward the decision of the text. upon taking their ain lives. both Cassius and Brutus officially verbalise their positions of their purposes in Caesar’s blackwash. but they besides have differing responses to what they have done. While Brutus seems to demo sorrow over killing Caesar. Cassius seems acrimonious about Caesar’s decease. with the claim that Caesar was â€Å"revenged† by Cassius’ self-destruction. as if to entitle him with the incrimination for his decease. Brutus seems sorry. as he states that Caesar was killed â€Å"with half so good a will† than himself. stating that he is more deserving of decease. and offering Caesar to â€Å"be still† in his decease. The protagonists’ positions on the blackwash thrust frontward the strong aspiration they show to achieve power themselves. and their feelings toward those who are in power. Opinions of Caesar’s success are to a great extent contrasted between the story’s protagonists to underscore how they see glory and fame. peculiarly comparing Antony and Cassius. Their positions oppose each other. with Antony strongly back uping the success and rise of Caesar. where Brutus claims that Romans â€Å"as underlings† should be endeavoring to travel against Caesar’s reign. and alter the manner Caesar is taking. Antony focuses strongly on Caesar’s lea ding as a positive portion of Rome’s society. and the love Caesar displays to the people. He signifies this by â€Å"thrice [ showing Caesar ] a kingly crown† . and stating the people of Rome of Caesar’s great efforts. Although the chief contrast lies here. both Brutus and Caesar himself have their ain sentiments. both of which slightly contrast with the positions of Antony and Cassius. Brutus responds to Caesar’s reign by oppugning Caesar’s character. and chew overing the thought that Caesar’s coronating â€Å"might alteration his nature† . implying that he may go a worse individual because of it. Caesar himself has a positive response to his addition of power. but shortly it seems as though power shortly goes to his caput. and he begins to do roseola determinations that regard the people of Rome more harshly. Each supporter has a different attack to Caesar’s reign. and each character responds to his rise in their ain single m ode. The segregation of sentiments in respects to power and glorification is contrasted in itself by each character’s shared desire for power. This component of the text is seen at some times more strongly than others. as characters portray their emotions through private and public ideas otherwise. and express more in what they think in private. Cassius. although apparently â€Å"for the good of Rome† is described by Caesar to â€Å" [ have ] a mean and hungry look† . implying that he has desire for power. which is besides seen through the deduction of his resentment and enviousness of Caesar when he claims that he was â€Å"born every bit free as [ him ] † . Brutus is likely the least power hungry of characters. although he still does want power and luck. as he claims he â€Å"would non hold it so† with Caesar a swayer. yet he still â€Å" [ loves ] him well† . Antony seems to desire the attending and regard of people in the assembly of Rom an citizens more than legitimate power over them. and uses his public speech production and persuasive accomplishments to accomplish this. with his repeat of the phrase: â€Å"Brutus is an honorable man† to condescend and degrade him. Caesar is the most power hungry of them all. although does non look it in his rejection of the Crown. He wants â€Å"men about [ him ] who are fat† in the sense of cognition. and content with the power they have. as he does non desire anyone stealing his power from him. Each supporter portions this lecherousness for glorification and prestigiousness. and each in a sense additions some victory throughout the text. Although there is a shared desire to obtain and keep power. the characters Shakespeare portrays in Julius Caesar depict the differing responses that many characters can hold to the power they have. or the power those around them have decidedly. They may portion some facets of their reactions. or portray it in a similar sense. but overall. the characters positions and sentiments vary to a great extent throughout the text. Each facet of the response characters have is seen in all four. but in each it opposes. as seen through the picks and contemplations that characters portray.